26 pages • 52 minutes read
George Orwell’s use of a first-person narrative charts the emotional development of the narrator. Initially, the narrator conforms to the colonialist vision, seeing the condemned natives as impersonal caged animals. Then the combination of the dog’s unprejudiced friendliness and the sight of the prisoner, who has only minutes to live, still making an effort to keep his feet dry, dramatically alter his point of view. He outwardly appears to return to complicity with his imperialist colleagues at the end of the narrative, although his continued awareness of the proximity of the corpse suggests his moral discomfort. The first-person narrative also serves to obscure the perspectives of the other characters in the narrative. The condemned man remains an enigma, and little insight is provided into his thoughts and psychological state, as the narrator is unaware of the meaning of his repeated pleas to his god.
Direct discourse, or dialogue, is used repeatedly in the text and has several functions. It primarily serves to draw the reader’s attention to the ethnic diversity of the group present at the hanging. The standard British English used by the superintendent and the narrator contrasts with the varieties of Indian English spoken by the Dravidian head guard and the “Eurasian boy.” The latter, in particular, mixes Hindi and English terms in a manner that might make his language difficult to understand for some readers, using words such as “boxwallah.” The only dialogue spoken by the prisoner is the name of the Hindu god Ram/Rama, which would be unfamiliar and unintelligible to many of Orwell’s Western readers. When the superintendent gives the order to proceed with the execution, he again speaks in Hindi (“chalo”—“let’s go / get on with it”). The effect of this linguistic variety is to stress the diversity and otherness of the various speakers. This stands in contrast to the universalizing conclusions drawn by the narrator about the shared humanity of all present.
Direct discourse also serves an ironic purpose. On two occasions, members of the execution party complain about their own suffering. First, during the prisoner’s long chanted prayer, the narrator imagines that all present are silently thinking, “[O]h, kill him quickly, get it over, stop that abominable noise!” (Paragraph 13). Then Francis, the guard, recounts how, in dealing with a struggling prisoner in the past, they had “reasoned with him,” asking that he consider “all the pain and trouble you are causing to us!” (Paragraph 22). The contrast between these complaints and the desperation of the silent prisoner highlights the detachment and callousness of the speakers.
Similes are comparisons using “like” or “as.” In this essay, they serve to create a contrast between the moments before and after the execution. At the beginning of the narrative, the guards treat the prisoner “like men handling a fish that is still alive and may jump back into the water” (Paragraph 2). The fishing simile highlights the idea of a life force in full flow, about to be interrupted. After the execution, the prisoner is described “as dead as a stone” (Paragraph 15), having been reduced to an inanimate object.
Orwell employs asyndeton—the omission of conjunctions joining a sequence of words or clauses—as he reflects on the complexity of the human physical, emotional, and intellectual life that is about to be extinguished. First, he lists the organs and bodily functions of the prisoner, pointing to the irony that the body continues to “toil away” at renewing itself right up to the moment of death: “All the organs of his body were working—bowels digesting food, skin renewing itself, nails growing, tissues forming—all toiling away in solemn foolery” (Paragraph 10). Orwell then proceeds to list the cognitive faculties and activities in the same manner: “[H]is brain still remembered, foresaw, reasoned—reasoned even about puddles. He and we were a party of men walking together, seeing, hearing, feeling, understanding the same world” (Paragraph 10). The lack of conjunction speeds the pace of the narrative, adding an urgency to the text that echoes the limited time remaining in the prisoner’s life. These descriptions emphasize the vitality of the human being who is about to be killed, underscoring The Inhumanity of the Death Penalty.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By George Orwell