49 pages • 1 hour read
Alyssa’s death haunts Theo and Robin. Her memory has a profound effect on their personalities, as they’re never able to completely abandon her. They live in the same house, eat the same food, and visit the same places as they did when she was alive. They occupy the same physical space, and it reminds them of her, suggesting that her absence so overwhelms them that they don’t want to abandon her. Theo sees his wife in his son’s behavior, so he consults his memory of Alyssa when he needs guidance. His memory of her shapes his parenting, as he’s always aspiring to be as good a parent as he thinks Alyssa was. As a result, Alyssa still plays an active role in raising Robin. Her absence is so overpowering that neither Robin nor Theo can imagine a life in which she doesn’t play a role. Their sense of loss is so deep that they try to relive their memories of her rather than come to terms with her death.
Robin’s personality changes after Currier’s experiment and then changes again when the treatment stops. Theo feels as though Robin becomes an entirely different and much happier person through the treatment, so the end of the experiment feels to Theo like a slow death for Robin’s new personality. As the treatment fades into the past, Robin’s access to the memory of Alyssa fades. He grieves his mother for a second time, while Theo grieves losing the happier Robin, whom he knew only for a brief time. After Robin’s death, Theo must grieve again. The end of the experiment is an escalating series of unstoppable, overwhelming losses for Theo, and the feeling of loss is overpowering. He watches his wife die, then his son’s happiness disappears, and he watches his son mourn Alyssa all over again, and then he loses Robin. In the end, Theo is so overwhelmed that he gives himself up to Currier’s machine and tries to live inside the digitized memory of his child, which is all he has left.
As well as individual loss and the loss of individuals, the novel portrays the world’s loss of an entire ecosystem. People watch as the environment collapses but do nothing to stop it. The loss of nature becomes a passive, horrific piece of theater that relegates the species that is destroying the planet (humans) to the role of an audience: Although their sense of loss is severe, humans feel incapable of stopping or curbing the destruction. Instead, they watch the news and complain to one another about petty issues via technologies such as the internet. An overwhelming sense of loss renders the species powerless to prevent the increasing destructive powers its inventions have created. Like Theo, humanity gives itself up to the easy, false digital world rather than confront the horrifying reality.
Bewilderment doesn’t portray environmental destruction as a natural event but as an event resulting from humanity’s inaction. People like Alyssa argue and lobby on behalf of the environment, but those who have the power to enact meaningful changes ignore suggestions to slow or stop the destruction. Most people simply don’t have the time, the energy, or the money to focus on anything other than trying to survive. Humans are so completely alienated from society and from nature that they don’t think that their actions effect any meaningful change. As a result, they become passive observers of a catastrophe. Most of humanity refuses to act not through malice but through a lack of belief in their ability to make any real difference in a society where they have no power.
In addition to those alienated from society are those who actively deny that the death of the environment is real. The key figure in this respect is the President, an unnamed political figure who wages a culture war against the environmental collapse to frame it in purely political terms. Whereas the collapse is a disaster for every living thing, the President dismisses it as a conspiracy against him. He motivates his followers by turning a moral cause into a political cause: Saving the environment, he says, is just another left-wing scheme to throw him out of office. To Theo’s horror, many people believe him. The President’s followers become active deniers of the reality of environmental collapse and cheer on the President’s refusal to take any action. They don’t just refuse to act; they take immense pleasure in declaring that they don’t need to do so.
Others are actively trying to damage the environment, and some try to help but do so in a misguided way. While hiking at the end of the novel, Robin and Theo come across manufactured piles of rocks. The story frames these cairns as attempts to bring beauty to the world that are misguided because in doing so they have dismantled an important local ecosystem. These people value nature but inadvertently destroy the environment. The cairns result in the death of salamanders and fish, and—in a tragic twist—dismantling them leads to Robin’s death. Like those who created the cairns, Robin tries to help the world by returning the stones to the river, but in doing so, he brings about his own death. Robin and the cairn builders exemplify how attempts to change the world for the better can lead only to more misery. Even when humans seem to act benevolently, their actions can be fraught with pain and destructive consequences.
Though the novel ends tragically, with the deaths of Robin and the apparent collapse of the environment, the story has hints of optimism. Theo creates an index of planets that could potentially host life. He imagines the many ways that lifeforms could develop, many of which radically differ from life on Earth. Theo’s index is optimistic in nature because it suggests that the universe is a bountiful place that can be home to countless and varied examples of life. Lifeforms can come into being in many ways, so humanity killing its own planet isn’t the end of life in the universe. As a result, the death of Earth’s ecosystem is a tragic but isolated incident. Elsewhere, life may continue to thrive in countless other ways.
A mathematical optimism, supported by research and data, characterizes Theo’s scientific work. However, his son’s optimism focuses more on the immediate world. Robin worries about the destruction of the environment but thinks that humans are intrinsically good. He wants to create more empathy in the world, theorizing that people will act if they know more about the dying plants and animals. Robin believes in humanity’s innate goodness, which speaks to his innocence and his optimism. His protests and activism are sincere attempts to draw attention to a problem in a cynical, alienated society. Even though he knows how destructive humanity has been, Robin can envision a better future for the world. This sincere optimism inspires other people.
The narrative removes much optimism from humanity’s hands. Robin observes the environment around him, as well as the environment of the past, and he can see the ways in which nature endures. Birds are the descendants of dinosaurs, and ancient plant species are still scattered throughout the forest even after several extinction-level events on Earth. Likewise, Theo’s research shows that life can arise in almost infinitesimal ways. The result of these ideas is that nature and life will endure in some form long after humans have destroyed themselves. This optimism for nature depends on a pessimism for humanity—which is, essentially, a lost cause. Though humans may destroy themselves and many other species, some form of life will survive long after humanity is gone. Nature finds a way to survive and—Robin thinks—will make a new and better world.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Richard Powers
Allegories of Modern Life
View Collection
American Literature
View Collection
Climate Change Reads
View Collection
Earth Day
View Collection
Family
View Collection
Grief
View Collection
Mental Illness
View Collection
National Book Awards Winners & Finalists
View Collection
Oprah's Book Club Picks
View Collection
Science & Nature
View Collection
The Booker Prizes Awardees & Honorees
View Collection
Valentine's Day Reads: The Theme of Love
View Collection