54 pages • 1 hour read
While Americans were deeply engaged in communal affairs for the first two-thirds of the 20th century, they retreated from one another and communal life in the last third of that century. Historically, there have been periods of collapse and renewal of civic engagement, so it is possible that the trends in the latter part of the 20th century can be reversed.
Drawing upon records of organizations and public opinion polls, Putnam demonstrates the decline of communal life in the US. As a result, social capital, or “social networks and the norms of reciprocity and trustworthiness that arise from them” (19), has declined with negative consequences for American society.
Social capital benefits both individuals and the community: A distrustful society is not as efficient, for example. Ideally, the positive consequences of social capital, such as cooperation and trust, should be maximized, while the negative consequences, such as sectarianism and corruption, should be minimized. Putnam distinguishes between inclusive or bridging forms of social capital and exclusive or bonding forms. Bridging forms are more valuable to society because they generate broader identities and reciprocity (23) but tie individuals weakly to one another. Bonding forms are beneficial for individuals but tend to bolster in-group loyalty and out-group antagonism. Putnam stipulates that groups fall along these dimensions but that the categories are not mutually exclusive.
After demonstrating the decline in social capital and civic engagement, Putnam considers explanations for the trend and the consequences of it. It is his intention to provoke a conversation about how to renew communal life in the US, and he concludes with thoughts about how to reverse this decline.
From 1973 to 1994, all forms of political participation, such as signing petitions and running for office, have declined significantly. Putnam observes that “more than a third of America’s civic infrastructure simply evaporated between the mid-1970s and the mid-1990s” (43). What is more, the forms of political participation that depend on others, such as serving on a committee or working for a political party, have dropped more precipitously than activities that can be done alone, such as writing a letter. Political discourse is resultingly marked by incivility.
Voting, the “most common act of democratic citizenship” (31), has declined by 25% in presidential elections since the 1950s despite relaxed registration requirements, an influx of African American voters who were previously denied voting rights in the South, and a more educated populace. Putnam notes that much of this change is generational, with Baby Boomers and their children less likely to vote than older generations. For this reason, it is an intercohort change, with change varying in different age groups. Similarly, individuals born after 1964 are less knowledgeable about public affairs than previous generations were in that age category. Ironically, party organizations are stronger than in the past, but party identification has grown weaker. Many identify as independents, for example. It is increasingly rare for people to attend meetings and volunteer for a political party, a fact leading Putnam to conclude that financial capital has replaced social capital. Fewer people are actively participating in politics and instead are assuming the role of spectators.
In his observations about American democracy in the 1820s, Alexis de Tocqueville highlighted the tendency of Americans to join voluntary organizations. Indeed, there were an impressive number of community-based, church-based, and work-based organizations in this period. However, Putnam argues that “active involvement in face-to-face organizations has plummeted” (63) in the last third of the 20th century. With the exception of the Great Depression, involvement in voluntary organizations rose steadily in the first two-thirds of that century. Four independent sources of evidence, namely organizational records, survey reports, time diaries, and consumer expenditures, confirm these findings.
A review of membership records alone shows an increase in the number of voluntary associations, yet very few of these new organizations are member centered. Instead, they are professionally staffed, advocacy organizations often based in Washington, D.C. Membership simply requires writing a check and possibly reading an occasional newsletter. As a result, they are tertiary associations based on mailing lists and do not provide members with meaningful social capital. When Putnam delves beyond the membership figures, he discovers that active involvement of individuals in voluntary associations has declined. Between 1973 and 1994, the number of people who assumed any leadership role in a local organization declined by 50% (60). In the mid-1970s, nearly two-thirds of Americans attended club meetings while by 1999, two-thirds never attend such meetings. He cites the decline of the PTA in the last third of the century as one example. The overall decline accelerated after 1985. Again, Putnam cites generational replacement as a major source of these declines.
Religious institutions are the single most important source of social capital in the US, with nearly half of all associational memberships related to places of worship and half of all personal philanthropy and volunteering religious in nature (66). Religious communities foster civic skills, with attendees more likely to vote, volunteer, and have deep connections to their communities. While religious beliefs in the US have been stable over the last century, participation in religious institutions has declined approximately 10% from the mid-1970s to mid-1990s, and the slump accelerated from the mid-1980s to mid-1990s.
The decline is even greater for actual attendance and participation, which have dropped at least 25%. Hence, those claiming religious membership are not attending as often as before. The more demanding the form of participation, the greater the decline. All age cohorts have reduced involvement, but Baby Boomers and their children are less observant than previous generations.
More people are experimenting with different congregations, which makes them less committed to one particular community: Institutionalized religion is simply not as central to the lives of Baby Boomers as it was to their parents. To be sure, Putnam observes that the “pace and direction of change has varied markedly among different denominations” (75). Evangelical religions have grown while mainline Protestant denominations have declined, but historically, evangelicals have been less likely to participate in the broader community with their activities limited to co-religionists. Putnam thus sees growth among the most secular and the most orthodox, with the middle collapsing. As a result, religion is less effective as a foundation for civic engagement (78). He concludes that trends in religious participation replicate those in secular civic life: Religion flourished in the first two-thirds of the 20th century then experienced a decline, which is tied somewhat to generational replacement but also to other factors.
Work-related organizations, such as unions and professional organizations, have experienced the familiar pattern of modest growth in the beginning of the 20th century, rapid growth after World War II, followed by a plateau and then a sharp decline in the last third of the century (80), but evidence refutes the idea that social capital has migrated from communal associations to the workplace. Importantly, one-third of Americans are not employed and therefore have no workplace connections.
The rate of union membership has been in free fall for the last four decades of the 20th century. While Putnam acknowledges the role of structural changes, such as the shift toward a service economy and anti-labor policies, in this decline, he also argues that fewer workers expressed a desire to join a union between 1977 and 1991. Professional organizations have grown in whole numbers, but the percentage of professionals who join these organizations has declined. Thus, the rate of membership follows the same pattern.
Putnam notes that there is no evidence to support the idea that socializing informally in the workplace has increased in this period. To the contrary, workplace friends tend to be casual acquaintances, and trends in the workplace have arguably damaged social ties among workers. Specifically, downsizing, performance-based evaluations and pay, and outsourcing have increased workplace anxiety. In this environment, workers are more inclined to keep their “heads down” (88) and view their co-workers as competitors. Friendships also decrease with job instability. Indicative of this loneliness at work, job satisfaction declined 10% between 1972 and 1998. Putnam concludes that work lives need to be better integrated with communal and social ones to increase the social capital that comes from work-related connections.
In the introductory chapters, Putnam documents the multiple forms of formal community engagement that have decreased over the course of the 20th century, such as political participation, membership in fraternal organizations, religious participation, and workplace ties. This introduces the theme of A Recurring Pattern of Social and Civil Disengagement. To demonstrate the change, Putnam relies upon survey data, time diaries, organizational records, and consumer expenditures. However, he delves deeper than the superficial numbers. For example, he compares the types of organizations to which Americans were likely to belong in the 1990s versus the 1960s. The newer organizations require very little of members and were run by professionals whereas the older organizations had local chapters, and members attended meetings and gave much more of their time. These organizations, though, were in many cases segregated by race and gender, a fact that very possibly contributed to their decline. Yet, they nonetheless produced social capital among the groups that they benefitted. Increased diversity and inclusivity have not compensated for the decline in membership of such groups. Over and over, the forms of community engagement that demand collective effort have declined substantially. The declines are not as steep in activities that can be done individually, such as writing a letter to a member of Congress.
While individualism has always been an American value, Putnam worries that it has become radicalized in the 1990s. Previously, rampant individualism was checked by commitments to community. Referring to Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America, published in 1835, Putnam chronicles the American penchant for joining together to better communities in the 19th century. De Tocqueville was a French aristocrat and observer of the workings of American democracy who considered this American tendency critical to the success of the democratic experiment. Compared to other industrialized nations, the US additionally has a high rate of religiosity, which also serves to restrain the effects of individualism. Yet this too is declining. Putnam seeks to highlight this decline in social capital, identify its causes and consequences so as to start a conversation about reversing these trends. He is not the first to notice the decline in communal values, as Habits of the Heart was published in the 1980s. The title is taken from a phrase in de Tocqueville’s work and refers to family ties, religious values, and public participation, all of which offset a dangerous form of individualism. The authors worried that individualism was unchecked and undermining communal life, and Putnam provides extensive data to support those concerns.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: