62 pages • 2 hours read
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Even after the New York Times publishes its article, Farrow continues to add to his story. He talks to Lucia Evans a former actress assaulted by Weinstein in 2004. He dangled career opportunities in front of her in exchange for sexual favors and proceeded to assault her. Farrow prepares his story and reaches out to Lisa Bloom for comment. She refuses to help and passes them over to other members of Weinstein’s legal team. Not long after their phone call ends, Bloom resigns from Weinstein’s legal team.
Farrow tries to reach Weinstein directly. They have long discussions with many people present on both ends of the call. Some of their discussions are on the record and some are explicitly off the record. Weinstein flits between sounding defeated and charming. He disputes Farrow’s definition of rape as well as other aspects of the women’s claims. Eventually, Weinstein denies any claims of non-consensual sex and spends “an inordinate amount of time attacking the character of the women in the story” (174). He seems angry that recordings of him still exist, and his temper flares more frequently as the call progresses. When Weinstein makes the most extraordinary claims or threats, his lawyers cut the phone call. Eventually, the relevant comments he makes are included in the article. The final story is ready by October 10th, 2017. The article goes live, and Farrow sits down and reflects on what he has done. He burned many professional bridges and has no assurance of a job. His phone begins to receive messages. Many are from fellow journalists congratulating him, and others are from strangers, telling him that they have stories of their own.
Oppenheim reaches out to Farrow to offer him a new contract with NBC in an attempt to limit the network’s liability. Farrow is reluctant to accept because he does not want to be forced to lie about NBC’s role in suppressing the story. He worries that the contact from Oppenheim is merely an attempt to stymie a burgeoning public relations crisis. Farrow is torn; at a big network like NBC, he believes he can bring the stories of the survivors the attention they deserve. One of the people from NBC who reaches out to him is Matt Lauer.
Farrow appears on many networks, including NBC, and tries to refocus discussion of the story on the survivors. In one interview on MSNBC, Rachel Maddow asks him why he published with The New Yorker rather than NBC He struggles to dodge the question and denies NBC’s claim that his initial story was too weak to report. As he walks off the set afterwards, Farrow bursts into tears.
As soon as the Rachel Maddow interview is over, Farrow receives a call from Noah Oppenheim. Farrow’s comments have “set off a firestorm” (180) and Oppenheim sounds nervous. He hopes Farrow will sign a statement explaining that NBC never had the whole story. The two men spend hours debating the finer points of how Farrow can exculpate NBC. Farrow wants to return to his job but he refuses to compromise his ethics. He remains in the Maddow studio for hours arguing on the phone with Oppenheim and others. Rumors persist that NBC has helped to cover up numerous scandals.
Farrow sits down for an interview with Matt Lauer on NBC. Lauer seems awkward and tries to compel Farrow to agree with statements that are patently untrue. Hours later, Oppenheim gathers together all of the producers and reporters to come to an agreement on what happened with the Harvey Weinstein story. Even as he tries to set the story straight, McHugh speaks out to disagree. The journalists at NBC are all confused and annoyed that NBC may have shut down a legitimate investigation. Afterward, Oppenheim and McHugh have a heated discussion and McHugh is left wondering whether he has the cachet or the profile to refuse to toe the company line like Farrow.
Even famous figures like Hillary Clinton are swept up in the aftermath of the story. She tries to keep silent on the matter, but finally she is forced to issue a statement saying that she is shocked and appalled. Woody Allen is criticized for saying that “the whole Harvey Weinstein thing is very sad for everybody involved” (182). Other celebrities claim that they never knew about Weinstein’s behavior.
The women in Farrow’s story react in the wake of publication. At the same time, many of the people who secretly worked for Harvey Weinstein begin to unravel. Rose McGowan thanks Farrow, as does Annabella Sciorra who opens up about her own experience of sexual assault by Weinstein which took place across many harrowing years. The actress Daryl Hannah also comes forward with a similarly horrifying story. All of the women felt their careers were threatened because they dared to decline Weinstein’s advances. Additionally, they struggled to tell their stories because Weinstein’s “vice grip on the media made it hard to know whom to trust” (187). Weinstein is also accused of spying on people who might move against him. Farrow inquires more about this and is given the name of the British journalist Seth Freedman.
Seth Freedman is a stockbroker turned Israeli Defense Forces recruit turned whistleblower turned journalist. Farrow reaches out to Freedman, who immediately and enthusiastically offers to help and sends a “list of targets” (188) which features many of the women from Farrow’s reporting. In a conversation with Farrow, Freedman suggests that he worked for Weinstein in the past to gather information about people but insists that he backed out of any operation when he learned that the case involved sexual assault. Freedman eventually mentions the name Black Cube to Farrow.
One of Israel’s foremost private detective/intelligence firms, Black Cube has 100 employees who speak 30 languages, offices in London, Paris, and Tel Aviv, and an incredibly strict security policy. As Farrow investigates Black Cube and convinces some internal sources to talk to him, the agency denies everything. Employees confess to nefarious behavior on the condition of anonymity. One anonymous source agrees to send Farrow documents.
The documents from Black Cube detail the firm’s work for Harvey Weinstein. Black Cube agreed to provide intelligence to stop the publication of a negative article about Weinstein and to obtain the content of a book being written about him. The firm has a dedicated team of intelligence officers who use fake identities, often posing as investigative journalists. The bills from Black Cube amount to $1.3 million.
Black Cube insists that it adheres to the law, but sources suggest otherwise. Farrow contacts David Boies whose name appears on the contracts and whose law firm also represents the New York Times. Eventually Boies admits that they should not have hired “investigators that we did not select and direct” (192). He claims that hiring Black Cube was a mistake. When Farrow returns to his anonymous sources at Black Cube, he thinks that he might have become embroiled in a “civil war among spies” (193) with different people sending him competing information. Farrow delves deeper.
The editorial team at The New Yorker wants to find out more about the anonymous sources sending Farrow information about Black Cube’s activities. Farrow reaches out to McGowan who was supposedly targeted by an undercover Black Cube agent. McGowan recognizes the woman immediately as Diana Filip.
Diana Filip’s real name is Stella Penn Pechanac. She grew up in the Balkans during a devastating war and later became an Israeli citizen. For years she worked for Black Cube trying to extract information from people using a variety of fake names and identities. Black Cube dispatched her to McGowan to infiltrate the actress’s life and try to learn anything she could about her upcoming book which made accusations against Harvey Weinstein. The two women became good friends. Farrow reveals to McGowan what he has learned about Diana, and she is shocked.
Harvey Weinstein’s intelligence operations are not limited to Black Cube. Farrow uncovers more and more private intelligence firms during his investigation. Sometimes those who work within the firms want to leak anonymous information while the heads of the firms want to disparage and implicate their rivals. Such firms have helped Weinstein take on plentiful legal battles by researching, threatening, and blackmailing his enemies. Detailed reports of people like Rose McGowan pinpoint exact ways in which she could be targeted or discredited. Similar patterns exist around women like Ambra Gutierrez.
The close bond between Weinstein and Dylan Howard of the National Enquirer also emerges. Howard hired reporters and photographers with the express purpose of digging up potentially damaging information. Farrow and his team prepare a report on Weinstein’s “army of collaborators” (198). Panicked, the people implicated in the story send legal threats, just as Weinstein had done in the past. The article is published anyway. Roman Khaykin and Igor Ostrovskiy read the article and realize what they have been hired to do. They disagree on the morality of their involvement but insist that they have not broken the law. Farrow tries to uncover the identity of his anonymous source inside Black Cube to offer whatever protection he can, but the source declines to identify herself beyond saying that she is a woman who was ashamed of her role in defending Weinstein.
Sources come forward to claim that Dylan Howard and the National Inquirer have stories on far more people than just Harvey Weinstein and that the newspaper deliberately silences these stories as personal favors. A story about a model named Karen McDougal who had an affair with President Donald Trump is among the rumored stories. Farrow reaches out to McDougal to see if she will go on the record about her experience. He discovers that her silence has been bought with a nondisclosure agreement. Nevertheless, she begins to open up to him.
McDougal met Trump at a party at the Playboy Mansion in 2006. He had recently married the Slovenian model Melania Knauss with whom he had a two-month-old son. Nevertheless, Trump was immediately attracted to McDougal and pestered her throughout the day. They had sex, and afterwards he offered her money. She refused but occasionally visited him whenever he was in Los Angeles. The two began a regular affair which ended after nine months. When Trump announced his presidential run, McDougal considered selling her story to the media. Through a series of lawyers and intermediaries Trump begged Howard to buy the story. The National Inquirer bought the exclusive rights to McDougal’s version of events but never published them. She did not truly understand the ramifications of the documents she signed.
After Trump wins the presidency, McDougal no longer wants to remain silent. She reaches out to Farrow to spread her story to the world even though Trump and the White House dismiss her account as “fake news.”
Farrow uses Karen McDougal’s experience with the National Inquirer and their parent company AMI to research more instances of stories being suppressed for Donald Trump. One rumor suggests that Trump fathered a child with his housekeeper. The rumor may not be true, but Farrow’s investigation suggests that AMI certainly bought the exclusive rights to such a story from a former Trump employee named Dino Sajudin. Later, when journalists try to report the story, AMI threatens to sue anyone who breaches their exclusivity deal.
By March 2018, sources within the National Inquirer are willing to talk. A few days later, Farrow seeks out Sajudin, the supposed hidden Trump child, but the pursuit returns nothing. Dylan Howard and others at AMI deny everything, as does the President’s team at the White House. The New Yorker publishes a story on everything they have been able to discover and verify.
AMI does not have a successful track record in trying to catch and kill every story. One infamous story links Trump with the billionaire investor and accused pedophile and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Farrow is able to verify the friendship between Epstein and Trump but not the accusations of serious sexual assault that were made by one woman against the two men. Howard and people at AMI certainly tried to silence the accuser by purchasing her story but could not complete the deal. The National Enquirer runs several stories about the accusations which take Trump’s side and dismiss the allegations as unfounded and disgusting.
Another story circulating around Trump concerns an affair with the pornographic actress Stormy Daniels. She signed an NDA to prevent her from talking about a sexual affair with Trump, similar to the agreement signed by McDougal. The string of stories AMI tried to bury on Trumps behalf “raised thorny legal and political questions” (208), writes Farrow. The President discloses none of the payments he makes to women and may have violated election law. Meanwhile, the executives at AMI benefit from the services they provide in catching and killing stories about Trump, who helps to arrange business deals and other profitable ventures for them through the White House. AMI has also amassed a treasure trove of information they could potentially use to blackmail the President. Howard brags to friends about how much power his accumulation of stories brings him.
Part 4 switches the tone of the book from careful reportage to a spy thriller. The description of the surveillance tactics used by the private detectives and the intelligence operations astonishes Farrow. Large parts of the book explore the sheer range of technology the investigators have at their disposal when chasing after Farrow and others. Undercover reporters, GPS tracking, and threatening pictures of guns are all tactics used by Weinstein’s people. The depiction of the tactics illustrates the different power levels of the abusers and the survivors. The abusers such as Harvey Weinstein have the financial means available to hire extraordinarily capable men to hound and terrify any woman who might accuse them of indiscretion. The women in turn do not have equivalent financial power and can therefore be bullied into submission. Part of Weinstein’s method of keeping power depends on his having power already. He is able to remain untouched in the entertainment industry because he has the power to destroy anyone who wishes to challenge his wealth and privilege. The range of techniques used to surveil Farrow also demonstrate the gap between the two sides and the dedication men like Weinstein have to ensuring that they are allowed to continue their behavior.
Part 4 also shows the devastating effects that the investigation has on Farrow’s personal life. The story takes up more than a year of his life, and even the publication of the article does not end the process. He has to make media commitments to raise awareness of the story and to write follow-up articles from more accusers. Farrow’s boyfriend Jonathan is as supportive as he can be, but their relationship becomes strained at times. They rely on one another for support, and Farrow takes care in the book to thank his boyfriend—to whom he proposes during the editing process of Catch and Kill—throughout. The investigation into Weinstein may have turned Farrow into a recluse, but the release of the story allows him to move forward free of the pressure and the fear which bedeviled him for many months. The lifting of this burden also releases the pressure on his personal life and relationships.
Catch and Kill pulls back the veil from the Weinstein investigation and informs the reader that the tactics portrayed in the book are used by many other powerful figures. The media moguls and the rich are both shown to be capable of behaving like Weinstein. The accusations spread as far as the President of the United States. Several chapters describe the way in which Donald Trump used Weinstein’s tactics to catch and kill stories about his own affairs and accusations of sexual harassment. Weinstein is not a unique figure. His behavior is indicative of a pattern of abuse which extends as far as one of the most powerful people in the world.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: