31 pages • 1 hour read
Summary
Scene Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Throughout western education, the Ancient Greeks are portrayed as the cradle of advanced civilization. They are lauded as the foundation of democracy, art, philosophy, and science. The defeat of Ancient Persia in the Greco-Persian Wars in the mid-4th century BCE launched the division of east and west as well as the privileging of Greek and Roman history. Emily surprises Isaac in Scene 2 when she tells him that Islamic artists were the source of artistic techniques that are credited to later western artists. She asserts, “The Muslims gave us Aristotle. Without them, we probably wouldn’t even have visual perspective” (30). Emily and Isaac use this knowledge to claim that Islam is universal and therefore give themselves permission to use and exploit Islamic themes.
Amir, however, wants to privilege the west because he wants to be accepted in the United States. The play follows an Aristotelian definition of tragic drama and plot structure, also known as a climactic or Freytag model. According to Aristotle, a tragedy concerns powerful and significant people—people who are better than the average citizens. At the beginning of the play, Amir is powerful and in control. He has authority. In a Greek tragedy, as explained by Aristotle, the protagonist begins at a high level in society and falls to a low level or dies due to a tragic flaw or fate. Amir’s tragic flaw is his self-hatred. Amir chose a Jewish-owned law firm because he wanted to distance himself from who he was. He changed his name and his social security number, even though lying about himself is a constant threat to his success.
Fate intervenes when the New York Times makes it seem as if Amir is representing the imam when he is not. Amir loses everything to his self-hatred. He is passed over for a promotion and eventually fired from his job. His wife has an affair with a man who supports her love of Islam, and Amir loses his marriage when he lets his anger at himself explode and hits his wife. Amir even loses the respect of his nephew when Abe sees how Amir’s self-loathing has undermined his own success and hurt someone he loves. Privileging western culture forces Amir into this Aristotelian formula for drama, and it is inevitable from the beginning of the play that Amir will fall.
The title of the play, Disgraced, is a word that is laden with religious implications. “Grace” suggests religious blessings or divine favor, and someone who is disgraced has lost that favor or status. At the beginning of the play, Amir is disgraced as a Muslim. He has rejected the religion and actively spurned its tenets by marrying a non-Muslim, eating pork, drinking alcohol, and denying the imam’s attempts to convince him to pray. Although Abe points out that the Quran allows Muslims to hide their faith, Amir fights to prove that he has no faith. He insults Muslims by stating that his departure from the religion is the result of intelligence. As Amir states in Scene 3, rejecting Islam makes him an apostate, a crime that is punishable by execution. Amir takes a job working for people who he believes hate his own people, forcing his assimilation by internalizing Islamophobia.
Amir is also disgraced when he falls from a place of status to a point where he is jobless, and his marriage has ended. Ironically, this disgrace arises when Amir gives in to Abe and Emily and speaks out for a Muslim holy man. Disgrace describes the way anti-Muslim sentiment in the United States first pushes Amir to hate himself and deny his heritage and then punishes him when the heritage he rejected is discovered. As an employee of the firm, Amir has been exemplary aside from a small lie that fell on the line between Pakistan and India. His fall from grace may have begun with the racial and religious prejudice of his bosses and his wife’s infidelity or it may have begun with Amir’s own obsession with race, but Amir facilitates his own disgrace when he loses control of his anger. By the end of the play, Amir is disgraced both as a Muslim and as a person who has assimilated in the United States.
When Isaac comes to the apartment to see Emily’s work, they discuss the issue of a White woman using Islamic themes in her art. Isaac mentions that critics might accuse Emily of Orientalism, the theory published by Edward Said that asserts that westerners see the east as exotic and different and that the production of knowledge in western countries shapes the lens through which westerners view eastern culture. Isaac includes Emily’s husband as part of this Orientalism, which Emily does not appreciate. By the end of the scene, Emily has convinced Isaac that because Islam is at the root of many significant traditions and practices in art, the Islamic culture is somehow universal and fair game for White artists to appropriate. In the third scene, both Emily and Isaac defend Islam to Amir without actually understanding many of the nuances of what it means to grow up with the religion.
The crux of this cultural appropriation in the play is the fact that association Muslim identity destroys Amir’s career and causes Abe to become a target of the FBI. Yet, as a White woman, using Islam causes Emily to succeed in her career. Isaac can curate a show in a museum that profits from the exploitation of Islamic culture. Emily can romanticize things that are beautiful about Islam without falling prey to Islamophobia. Isaac praises her incorporation of Islamic elements into her art as fresh and new, including her work in a show full of artists who he deems to be heroes. Ironically, Emily’s defense of using Islam rests on the understanding that their artistic practices and innovations are ancient and predate the way westerners have used them.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: