51 pages • 1 hour read
The arrival of another Spanish villain in Peru in 1531 began a chain of acts of wickedness “on such a scale that nobody will ever really learn the full extent of it until all is revealed on the Day of Judgement” (107).
Acts here included sacking towns and stealing their gold. On the island of Puna, the Spanish stayed with natives for six months, eating all their food and then killing and enslaving the people. Atrocities in the province of Tumbes caused the people to flee. At their capture, they were declared enemies of the Spanish Crown for fleeing and had to buy back their protection through massive gifts of gold and silver. The territory’s king, Atahualpa, was abducted and ransomed for a vast sum of gold and then burned at the stake anyway.
Las Casas quotes a letter from the Friar Marcos de Niza, a witness to these atrocities, to the Franciscan bishop of Mexico. This letter details the kindness and graciousness of the Peruvian people and their atrocious treatment by the Spanish. It also details the burning of Atahualpa, his captain-general Chalcuchima, and the lord of the Quito province, Chamba. It furthermore describes the torture of Quito leaders for gold and the live burning of villagers locked inside buildings and set on fire. People had their hands and feet cut off, had dogs set on them, and infants were killed in front of their mothers. This rightly inspired the Peruvians to revolt against the Spanish, hide what remained of their gold, and refuse to divulge its locations.
This letter predates Las Casas’s text by 10 years. Since then, atrocities in the region only continued.
In 1539 adventurers in Peru went inland and found New Granada, “extraordinarily rich both in gold and in those precious stones known as emeralds” (116). It is called New Granada because the first Spaniard to land there, Jiménes de Quesada, hailed from Granada.
A report to the Council of the Indies detailed the atrocity here. Spanish colonialism began in the encomienda style. The Spanish then captured the region’s king and ransomed him for a house full of gold and precious stones. When the people could not completely fill the house, the Spanish tortured the king to death. The entire town burned down during this torture, a sign of abomination from God (117).
Lords across the region were killed in the same fashion. Those who escaped into the mountains were pursued and killed. In efforts to terrorize communities into submission or gain knowledge of the whereabouts of leaders in hiding, many villagers were publicly murdered, mutilated, or thrown to wild dogs. The Spanish stormed a mountain to which the villagers had retreated, massacred them, and threw them off the rocks. According to Las Casas, “Witnesses claim that the sky was quite darkened with the sheer numbers of falling bodies” (121). All in all, New Granada was so devastated that if these massacres were not stopped quick, there would soon be “no native people left to work the land” (122). The nearby provinces of Popayán and Cali were destroyed in similar fashions (123). Recounting these atrocities, Las Casas asks the reader if they think these natives would have been better off living in hell rather than under Spanish control. He pays special attention to how the people were sold as live dog food: “Is it possible to imagine anything more dreadful, more brutal, or more inhuman?” (125).
Las Casas solemnly states he watched such atrocities unfold for 42 years, and at no point did the natives deserve such action. He also laments that because the Spanish have not been proselytizing, “the peoples of the New World are as ignorant of God as they were a hundred years ago” (126).
The Conclusion asserts Las Casas was persuaded to write the work by the grace of God and the concern of the Spanish court. It aims to ensure that the “teeming millions” of the New World “for whose sins Christ gave His life, do not continue to die in ignorance” (127). Las Casas believes that these atrocities will be stopped if they come to the attention of the Charles V, “as one wedded to the concept of justice and avid to see it prevail” (128). The New World was bestowed by God on Spain and Charles V, and his actions of reform here will be taken “for the greater glory of the Holy Catholic Church and for the salvation of his own royal soul” (128).
After the above was written, a set of New Laws (the New Laws of Burgos) were enacted. The New Laws were made in collaboration with many learned and moral experts and did indeed work against the depravity of atrocity in the New World. However, Spanish colonizers, seeing that their way of life was now illegal, did not cease their depraved actions. Instead, they behaved as “true outlaws, recognizing no limit whatever to their actions and inflicting a tyrannical misery on the people” (129). This was particularly true in Peru.
Las Casas deems infighting among the colonizers and their death at each other’s hands as just deserts from God. Many Spanish, now disallowed from murdering natives on sight, killed them slowly though hard labor, and “[t]o date, the Crown has not shown itself strong enough to put a stop to these injustices” (129). Such acts do not just damage the Spanish interest; they are dishonorable to the king and to God.
These final chapters close A Short Account in much the same manner that the others were written. There is little that descriptively or argumentatively distinguishes these chapters from the rest of the text. This does not signal a lack of creativity or writing skill; it is instead a testament to the consistency and simplicity of Las Casas’s arguments and to how standardized the Spanish colonists’ senseless acts against the natives had become by the time of his writing.
Las Casas’s mention of judgment day in Chapter 19 is a particularly vivid citation of a biblical concept, but it works wholly within Las Casas’s constant argument that divine judgment is destined for both Spain and its conquistadors. Las Casas’s note that natives who die cannot work the land is another common aspect of his argument: This murder of natives disrupts their harvest of resource wealth for the Spanish. Similarly, asking the reader whether the natives would be better off in hell is an example of a common dialectic set up in the text, one that contrasts the paradisiacal landscape of the Americas before Spanish arrival with the hellscape it became.
The rhetorical techniques of the Preface return in the Conclusion. Las Casas honors Charles V as a moral ruler, reminding him of his divine appointment and moral responsibilities while also imploring him to act. Las Casas’s reaffirmation that God bestowed the New World on Spain, and that taking action would serve the greater glory of the church, is a clear reference to Pope Alexander VI’s grant of sovereignty of the Americas to the Castilian Crown, and as such a veiled threat that this divine privilege can be revoked. Las Casas’s subsequent mention of the New Laws of Burgos is a good example of how he uses his religious perspective and citation of divine legislation to push for more intervention “on the ground.”
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: