48 pages • 1 hour read
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Content Warning: This section of the guide contains references to sexual violence, antisemitism, genocide, and suicide.
The family dog, Jor, follows the events of the novel into very old age. As a symbol, he comes to represent protectiveness and stubbornness, especially for Micòl. As a black and white Great Dane, he is repeatedly described in terms of stone such as being called “granitic” and “statuesque.” He travels around the expansive estate with relative freedom, and he appears at key moments in the plot. Most commonly he appears in place of Micòl or when she needs protecting. In Part 3, Chapter 7, the narrator can infer that Micòl has returned home from Venice just by meeting Jor at the bridge. Since he either meets visitors at the gate or appears without warning, the text imbues Jor with an uncanny intelligence. He nearly always accompanies Micòl when she is walking with the narrator throughout the estate. However, the only time he is described as an active figure instead of a looming presence occurs when Micòl needs help. When the narrator’s advances change into physical aggression toward a sick Micòl, the narrator describes the door as being “shaken by a violent impact” (146). The narrator doesn’t even recognize the sound and imagines it as a person trying to break into the room. The aggression and physical strength of Jor juxtapose Micòl’s eerie calmness as she explains what it is and orders the narrator to open the door. Throughout the novel, Jor can do things that Micòl cannot, and his presence highlights when Micòl is not fully in control. Both Jor and Micòl are very independent and the connection the text makes between them highlights the internal life of Micòl and her dedication to preserving The Appearance of Propriety.
Throughout the novel, the narrator alternates between deep respect for Perotti and discomfort with the way he obsesses over every detail. The narrator is overcome with emotion when he encounters the symbol of the carriage as an adult. For him, the carriage has been frozen in time. However, Micòl doesn’t see it this way. Instead, she calls it a “pathetic relic” and laments Perotti devoting so much time to its useless preservation. Perotti’s obsession mirrors the narrator’s own dedication to the history of the Finzi-Contini family. Micòl is confident that the carriage wouldn’t be as beautiful to the narrator in the light of day. In this same way, Micòl is sure that a relationship between her and the narrator wouldn’t be possible outside of these quiet, isolated moments in the garden.
In the carriage, Micòl warns the narrator, saying, “[o]bjects also die, my friend. And if they also must die, then that’s it, better to let them go. It shows far more style, above all. Don’t you agree?” (79). After she has told him about the physical issues with the carriage, the narrator focuses on the body language of Micòl physically pulling away from him. The symbol of the carriage represents his devotion to the Finzi-Contini family, and it demonstrates how impossible it is to maintain such loyalty forever. The carriage will inevitably be beyond repair, and yet both Perotti and the protagonist fight against this change. While the carriage is allowed out a few times a year, Perotti cannot resist showing up every 10 or 15 days to work a “miracle” and make it presentable.
From the beginning of the novel, the motif of ancient and abandoned tombs is integrated into the story. While characters often talk about more modern cemeteries, they do not visit them as often. The narrator emotionally connects to the Etruscan tombs and the monument to the Finzi-Continis at the end of the Via Montebello. The young Giannina asks the group, “why is it that ancient tombs are not as sad as new ones?” (17). This question opens the group up to empathize with the Etruscans. The narrator imagines their lives and circumstances in great detail. The motif of ancient tombs presents a larger question within the novel about what legacy people will leave behind and whether there truly is an end to grief. When the narrator turns his thoughts to the “ugly tomb” at the center of the novel, his “heart ached as never before” (7). While the tomb cannot serve the purpose it was built for and has since been abandoned, it still greatly affects him. The emptiness of the Finzi-Continis tomb contradicts its intended purpose and thus the tragedy of the Holocaust undermines the tombs’ role in protecting a legacy.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: